Posts Tagged ‘Strategy’

Roles in managing internal communities

As our Community management practice is growing rapidly, we’ve spend some time at the end of the year to further professionalize our approach. One of the things we did was to describe the different roles and activities we see in managing internal communities. In moderating and activating communities we distinguish between 10 types of roles:

  1. Strategy and tactics: There needs to be a clear vision for the development of the community. This vision needs to be translated to types of activities the members should be encouraged to engage with. You need to develop multiple scenarios because some activities catch on and others do not. If activities do not catch on one should be able to quickly shift into another scenario. It is important to take into account the ‘What’s in it for me?’ question from the participants perspective and to check if there are no barriers that get in the way of these activities.
  2. Change management: To many organizations, achieving a state where people openly share, connect with each other, collaborate, and innovate requires a significant change in culture. Even though we believe that culture does not dictate our behavior, but it is the aggregation of our behaviour that defines culture; you need to actively promote the right behavior and deal with barriers such as fear, hierarchy, and knowledge as power. Senior management plays an important role by setting examples and endorsing exemplar behavior.
  3. Reactive moderation: There are numerous standard tasks that need to be performed. Examples are: making sure people have a complete profile, contacting inactive members, managing login issues, dealing with unwanted behavior, etc.
  4. Proactive moderation: This role is what we often refer to as ‘the magic’. You need to constantly scan the community for activity that, often with some orchestration, can help you realize your strategic vision. This role requires to ‘see through’ a standard question or idea and envisage its potential. Then try and identify and connect participants that can contribute. If the activity has significant potential, we often co-opt a senior manager to publicly endorse the initiative.
  5. Relationships and stakeholder management: This role lies within the client organization. There needs to be a very well networked person to make the connections with relevant people within the organization or with senior management to find people to further activate initiatives selected through the proactive moderation.
  6. Role models: You need commitment from senior management to behave as a role model. They should endorse behavior that is in line with the vision of the community, activate people to take ideas they post a step further, and ask the community questions or challenge them from time to time.
  7. Content management: Communities are enriched by content. Interviews need to be sourced with members, senior management, industry experts or other interesting and engaging people. Content needs to be well planned and prepared in advance so it can be deployed at appropriate times, such as during lulls in platform activity.
  8. Technical management: A plan needs to be in place to role out functionality related to the maturity of the community. Technical management works closely with the other community management roles to create a road-map of functionality. A close coordination with the scenarios is needed to match the functionality to the scenarios being played.
  9. Project management: Moderating and activating a community typically requires performing a great number of tasks. These tasks are either dynamic or routine. Dynamic tasks are responses to what is happening in the community and routine tasks cover things such as contacting all people that have not completed their profile. Rigorous project management is a must to make sure all tasks are covered and completed. We have developed software tailored to managing communities and these tasks in particular.
  10. Champions management: Your community will have members that are more active and set the right example. It is important to build relationships with such users over time and involve them in activating the community. The most important role these champions have, is being an antenna for ideas, problems, or solutions that are worth sharing. They then convince people to take their ideas, problems, or solutions to the community.

If you are interested in how this ties into our methodology and vision, you may also want to check out these earlier posts:

  1. Successful implementation of communities part 1
  2. Successful implementation of communities part 2
  3. Successful implementation of communities part 3
  4. Community management in innovative projects
  5. Start hiring guy #3
  6. Stop pitching social media to management

December 21st, 2009 by Jaap Linssen

3 Comments, Read more...

Innovation in a time of recession (part two)

The current financial crisis affects virtually every organisation to some extent and as a result less investments are being made. Actually, cost efficiency is a term that is mentioned a lot lately. Therefore, people question whether innovation will be high on the agenda. I dare to argue that it should be, otherwise these organisations will fall behind. This blog post is the second of two about innovation in a time of recession, and specifically focusses on the combination of innovation and cost efficiency. The first post was about innovation and strategic agility in times of recession.

Great Depression. Image source: http://recessionhistory.info/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/recessionjobhunters.jpgSales of innovative products in the Great Depression
In a blog post, written on the Innovate on Purpose blog, a comparison is made between the recent recession and the Great Depression. The writer quotes a report “Collateral Damage” released by the Boston Consulting Group. The report states that industries with highly innovative products withstood the Great Depression fairly well. An example is given in the form of the sales figures of refrigerators, considered an innovative product at the time, which grew by 30% from 1929 to 1933. You can grant this to the desire to be an early adopter or the fact that over time refrigerators save money by keeping food fresher, or a number of other attributes. But in the end, people were spending money on innovative products and services in truly bad economic times. To relate this with the recent recession, the winning combination would be to strive for innovative products and services that let consumers save money.

Cost saving idea challenges
Innovation is not only about new products and services, but also about new processes. A process innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly improved production or delivery method. First of all, idea generation focused on process innovation often generates ideas that cut costs. So the combination of innovation and cost efficiency can be brought together by idea challenges focussed on cost savings. In times when budgets are being cut back, this aspect of innovation can be very helpful. Secondly, when striving for a truly innovative environment it is very important that everybody in the organisation participates. This creates a situation where a small contribution by all, means a big difference at the bottom-line.

Involving all employees in a cost saving idea challenge therefore seems to create a double-win: an innovative organisation and ideas for cost savings.

August 3rd, 2009 by Jurjan Huisman

1 Comment, Read more...

Creating a culture of innovation

Since reading Gary Hamel’s latest book The Future of Management, I have been intrigued and inspired by the way W.L. Gore has innovation running through its veins, where the key word is collaboration.

In short, if you have an idea at W.L. Gore you are free to pursue it, although with such discipline that results from normal work are not jeopardized. There are no formal processes to guide these innovations. ‘All’ you need to do is to convince your colleagues about the potential value of your idea and get their help.

The mechanism is quite simple. Ideas with high perceived value will get a lot of support and bad ideas will not get support and vanish.

Working in this way W.L. Gore is able to scan great numbers of ideas and many are killed in an early stage and in a natural way.

The result is that W.L Gore is a very healthy company, is viewed as one of the most innovative companies in the world, and has been consistently ranked high in the lists of best places to work.

We use parts of the Gore vision at our clients a lot to improve the way they innovate.

I came across a presentation of W.L. Gore’s CEO, Terri Kelly, for MIT Sloan School of management. They summarized her talk as follows:

“A lot of companies ask about ’How do you innovate ? What do you invest in R&D?’ They’re not really the right questions to ask. We would flip that and talk more around ‘How do we create the right environment where collaboration happens naturally — that people actually want to work together, that they actually like to be part of something greater than just the individual contribution?’ And if you get that part right, all the other pieces fall in place that allow us to creat this great innovation cycle within Gore.”

Here is the entire 55 minute presentation. It is absolutely worthwhile to watch!

February 23rd, 2009 by Jaap Linssen

Read more...

Innovate the Google way

The Google StoryRecently I read the inspiring book “The Google Story“. Google is seen as one of the big examples of an innovative company and a lot of people state the 20% rule as a reason for that high level of innovation. The 20% rule refers to the percentage of time that software engineers get to work on whatever interests them. Personally I think that the 20% rule is not the main reason that Google excels at innovation. What is more important to my opinion is the culture and work philosophy at the company. Let me elaborate on that…

February 9th, 2009 by Jurjan Huisman

3 Comments, Read more...

McKinsey survey on Web 2.0 Enterprise

Management consultant McKinsey executed a survey to assess the adoption of Enterprise 2.0 tools.The results of the survey, based on answers of almost 2000 respondents, provide some interesting insights.

In the first place, Enterprise 2.0 is gaining traction in more companies; the initial small pilot projects have grown into serious applications that do change the way organisations are working and business is done. As a result companies plan to spend more on Enterprise 2.0 in the next year.

Secondly, the focus is less on technology and more on application of technology. The survey reveals that the technologies of P2P and web services have decreased in usage and that applications like blogs and wikis have grown. That’s a good sign showing that users are in charge of Enterprise 2.0, which is an imperative for successful introduction and use of Enterprise 2.0. In our experience, organisations where users drive Enterprise 2.0 are far more successful than organisations where IT is in control of Enterprise 2.0.

Third interesting point is that organisations are saying that the introduction of Enterprise 2.0 asks for and leads to other ways of organizing and collaboration. It’s not the technology, but it’s the change in the way people work that delivers value of Enterprise 2.0.

That’s also why application of Enterprise 2.0 tools can help organisations to become more innovative. The collaborative, grassroots way of communication of Enterprise 2.0 can be used as an important stepping-stone toward a more open culture, which is a prerequisite for an innovative company.

August 8th, 2008 by Han Gerrits

Read more...

Innovation Hacker

Gary Hamel wrote a great post on how not to start innovation initiatives. The article is great fun to read but also very true. We see organizations behave in this way regularly.

Hamel and colleagues have researched over 100 cases of innovation and have found they all have in common that “successful innovators have ways of seeing the world that throw new opportunities into sharp relief. They have developed, usually by accident, a set of perceptual “lenses” that allow them to pierce the fog of “what is” in order to see the promise of “what could be.”

May 13th, 2008 by Jaap Linssen

Read more...